China Law Blogs

Posts from blogs about Law in China

  • How to Get YOUR Products Out from Under Trump’s U.S.-China Trade WarPresident Trump has targeted about $250 billion of products imported from China. These China tariffs have been rolled out in three waves: (List 1) – has a 25% tariff that covers about $34 billion of Chinese products listed in 818 tariff subheadings. The 25% tariff for List 1 went into effect on July 6, 2018….
  • China Employee Mutual Terminations: The Dos and the Don’tsBecause China is not an employment-at-will jurisdiction, mutual termination is usually the safest path for a China employer that has chosen to terminate one of its China employees. In a mutual termination, it is critical the employer gets a termination agreement that resolves all outstanding matters with the relevant employee and that explicitly releases the…
  • China Technology Licensing Agreements: The Term SheetTen years ago, our China IP lawyers did maybe one or two licensing agreements a year. Five years ago, it was maybe one or two every four to six months. Fast forward to today and we are doing one or two a week. Why the big change? China wants foreign technology and it understands it…
  • Moving my blog site
  • How to become a China lawyer
  • Full Private Land Ownership Returns to China’s Cities
  • IP Dragon has found a new den: IPDRAGON.ORG
    From now on, you can find new articles of IP Dragon on: ipdragon.org.

    So good bye to ipdragon.blogspot,com and hello ipdragon.org.
    All ipdragon.blogspot.com links will continue to be active, but will be redirected to ipdragon.org
    Also you can find the articles from 2005 until now on ipdragon.org.

  • Constructed Knowledge Works Like a Red Flag To An Internet Intermediary
     Shades of Red by Skram1 see Colourlovers
    The real question: “What shade of red will attract liability?

    After publishing a draft of the copyright law, the National Copyright Administration comes now with a A Brief Explanation concerning the Copyright Law of the People’s Republic of China (Revision Draft)translated by China Copyright and Media. It makes the copyright more complete but most things were already known.

    This time let us look at the safe harbor provisions for network service providers, which were already promulgated in 2006 in the Regulation on the Protection of the Right to Network Dissemination of Information, and will probably be incorporated in the copyright law. The provisions exempt them from civil secondary liability of copyright infringements and related rights infringements. The Chinese safe harbor is broader than Title 17 U.S.C. section 512, Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) because it also includes the related rights performances and audio-visual recordings, and more narrower than Chapter 2, section 4, articles 12-15 Electronic Commerce Directive of the EU, because the latter applies horizontally, which means to all infringing online material.

    Since primary and secondary liability is such a colourful subject, this author has used primary and secondary colours to show similarities of concept between the different jurisdictions.

    DMCA (USA)
    - transitory digital network communications
    - system caching
    - information residing on systems or networks at direction of users
    - information location tools
    - non-profit educational institutions

    E-Commerce Directive (EU)
    - mere conduit
    - caching
    - hosting

    Network Dissemination Information Regulation  (China)
    - automatic access
    - automatic storage
    - information storage space to users, or services to the public
    - searching or linking services
    - educational institutions


    Chinese networks that host can be exempted from civil liability if they have no actual nor constructed knowledge. In the Network Dissemination Information Regulation there is article 22 (1): “Having not known and having no justified reason to know that the works, performances, or audio-visual recordings provided by the service object have infringed upon an other’s right;”

    In the DMCA the constructed knowledge (Red flag) provision is § 512(c)(1)(A)(ii): limiting liability where, “in the absence of such actual knowledge, [the service provider] is not aware of facts or circumstances from which infringing activity is apparent”. 

    Almost the same wording can be found in the E-Commerce Directive the constructed knowledge provision can be found in article 14 (a): “the provider does not have actual knowledge of illegal activity or information and, as regards claims for damages, is not aware of facts or circumstances from which the illegal activity or information is apparent“.

    In Viacom v. YouTube, that was decided April 5, 2012 by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, it was formulated eloquently: “The difference between actual and red flag knowledge is thus not between specific and generalized knowledge, but instead between a subjective and an objective standard.  In other words, the actual knowledge provision turns on whether the provider actually or “subjectively” knew of specific infringement, while the red flag provision turns on whether the provider was subjectively aware of facts that would have made the specific infringement “objectively” obvious to a reasonable person.

    UPDATE: April 8, 2012, translation of Copyright Law of the People’s Republic of China has been uploaded on China Copyright and Media here, and includes:

    Article 69: “When network service providers provide storage, search, linking and other purely technological network services to network users, they do not bear a duty to examine for information concerning copyright or related rights.
                     Where network users utilize network services to conduct activities infringing copyright or related rights, the infringed person may notify the network service provider in writing, and require it to adopt necessary measures such as deletion, shielding, breaking links, etc. Where the network service provider adopts the necessary measures timely after receipt of the notification, it does not bear responsibility for compensation; where it does not timely adopt the necessary measures, it bears joint responsibility with the said network user.
                     Where network service providers know or should know that network users use their network services to infringe copyright, and do not adopt necessary measures, they bear joint liability with the said network users.

    Joint liability suggests the same gravitas as the liability of a primary infringer. This might be different from the U.S. and EU secondary liability.

  • Chinese Movie Posters Give You “Double Vision” Without The AlcoholClone and Original
    The silver screen is known to bring out the imagination of people. However, China’s film industry has not given birth to a poster child of creativity, eyeing laboriously to any movie that has some measure of success, Chinese or foreign, and subsequently clone the film poster designs.

    In November of 2011 I had my doubts about the independent creation of a Taiwanese movie poster, see here. Now Jing Gao of Ministry of Tofu has a series of 41 pairs of copycats and their originals, see here.

  • General

  • Search

  • Subscribe

      Enter your Email


      and receive updates by mail
  • Subscribe China Snippets Posts

      199 feed subscribers
      Google Reader or Homepage
      del.icio.us Shanghai China Snippets
      Add to My Yahoo!
      Subscribe with Bloglines
      Subscribe in NewsGator Online

      myFeedster
      Add to My AOL
  • Buy a Book

  • China Blogs